ceasefire
Yes (venue)
18%
24h Δ
-0.4¢
7d Δ
+4.2¢
Volume
$2.1M
Liquidity
$250.0K
7-day Yes path
Venue snapshots · as of 2026-08-04 21:56 UTC · MOCK series
Market probability
18%
Venue-implied · not our forecast
Analyst confidence
low
Assessment quality · not outcome odds
Data confidence
low
Coverage / freshness
Brief
Why priced this way: Venue-implied Yes ≈ 18% reflects venue-implied odds on written resolution criteria — crowd view of path likelihood, not verified adjudication. What moved it: Price action is effectively flat over the recent window; no material repricing signal. Assumptions embedded: The current price (Venue-implied Yes ≈ 18%) assumes the resolution criteria are interpreted as written — not as media narrative. Evidence support/challenge: linked event coverage is thin; treat first reports as claims. Most likely next mover: whether recent price action reflects new information or liquidity noise. Monitor: primary-source confirmation windows and catalyst calendars on linked events (48–72h).
Price action is effectively flat over the recent window; no material repricing signal.
Drivers
Current drivers
Recent developments
Case
YES argues that conditions required by the resolution criteria for “Will a Ukraine ceasefire be announced by October?” are more likely than the venue price implies, given linked intelligence.
Supporting developments
Historical precedents
Case confidence: low · composed_heuristic
Case
NO argues that the affirmative path stalls, is walked back, or fails resolution criteria — keeping Yes below the levels bulls imply.
Supporting developments
Historical precedents
Case confidence: low · composed_heuristic
Chronology
No linked event timeline yet.
Watch
Formal ceasefire proposal or rejection
48–72h after major kinetic or diplomatic peaks
Criteria typically require announced agreement — not informal pauses.
diplomacy · likelihood high
Graph
No related markets above threshold.
Context
Gaza / Ukraine ceasefire proposal cycles
Similarities
Differences
Lessons
Implied
Market probability is venue-implied. Analyst confidence is judgment quality of the assessment. Data confidence is coverage/freshness of linked events and snapshots — not a forecast of resolution.
StratosAmber provides the intelligence layer. We do not execute trades.